Sunday, January 04, 2009

Israel Is Not The Aggressor

Much of the "new left" is nothing less than Anti-Semitic.

The left's abilty to hate is a sight to behold.

HASAN QUDDIM leads a chant in front of scores of protesters along Main Street in Hartford Friday.
Ross Taylor photo

Original link courtesy of Bob Adams

We should note that their collective perspective is identical to that of the Nazi's however there's apparenly now a name for that - the "Godwin Law" makes it next to impossible to call a Nazi a Nazi - it's now against the rules.
They sure like it to me too; but heaven help you if you even suggest they're acting like Nazi's.

Worse some leftists of Jewish descent with attitudes their own grandparents (if they survived the Nazi's) would refer to as "Collaborators" (the ultimate insult) have the chutzpah to feign injury when they themselves are guilty of nothing less than overt anti-Semitism!

The majority of blogs tend to lean left as well.

Some post the truth so as to counter those that would willingly allow the total annilation of Jews.

Here's what is really going on, from a variety of sources.

History of Terrorism in Israel
The author states:
"..unable to find a comprehensive listing of all terrorist attacks in Israel and so, I made one myself." A blogger named " Linda (She's sharp, right wing, & attractive to boot!

The Christian Science Monitor
Israel, Hamas, and moral idiocy
Much of the world's response is a false moral equivalence that simply encourages the terrorists.
Alan M. Dershowitz


Disproportionate, Huh? Ruth King

National Review
Excessive Force? James S. Robbins

Haaretz Newspaper (Israeli - but remarkably balanced)
Hit them where it hurts Sayed Kashua (an Arab living in Israel)

Terrorism Awareness Project
What Really Happened David Horowitz


  1. "Godwin's Law" says that as an internet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.

    It says nothing about not being able to refer to Nazis as Nazis. I'm sure that distinction eluded you.

  2. A very great man said, on taking his leave of us:

    "Nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave...

    "A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification."

    Whether or not Israel is justified, I don't believe what they're doing is useful--that it will make them safer, that it will make us safer, that it will hasten peace. We have supported their policies unconditionally, as we would no other nation, because of our 'passionate attachment,' and it has not helped them, us, or the Palesinians.

    It might be time to listen to Washington: "Observe good faith and justice toward all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it?"

  3. There's quite a bit of unintentional irony in that parody NY Times front page that you posted.


Please keep it clean on topic.
If you are trying to send ACR a message use email instead: